A former milkman has been sentenced to 14 months in jail for assaulting police officers during a far-right protest outside Downing Street. David Probert, 50, of Hertfordshire, was found guilty of ‘lunging and charging’ at officers during the ‘Enough is Enough’ demonstration organized by far-right leader Danny Tommo. The protest, which took place on July 31, saw around 700 people gather in response to the tragic deaths of three schoolgirls in Southport. Probert, who joined the demonstration after hearing about the incident while on a fishing trip, was captured on police body-worn camera footage and a video broadcast by Sky News engaging in violent behavior towards law enforcement.
Background and Context
Probert’s participation in the protest was fueled by misinformation circulating online regarding the identity and immigration status of the alleged Southport killer. The event, organized by Danny Tommo, saw chants of ‘You’re not English anymore’ and ‘Who the f**k is Allah’ echoing through the crowd. Probert, dressed in a white North Face t-shirt and black cap, was seen attempting to charge at police officers alongside other demonstrators under Tommo’s direction.
The demonstration quickly escalated when one protester breached a barrier and another ignited a smoke flare. Some individuals began throwing projectiles at law enforcement, including cans and bottles, while one man even hurled a metal fence barrier towards officers. Despite initial arrest at the scene, Probert was later released due to health issues, only to be apprehended after police contacted his ex-partner who urged him to surrender.
Legal Proceedings and Sentencing
During the trial at Inner London Crown Court, footage of Probert’s actions was presented, showcasing his deliberate and aggressive behavior towards law enforcement. Despite his defense citing mental health concerns and recent diagnoses of autism and physical ailments, the judge deemed Probert’s actions as purposeful and dangerous. While acknowledging the defendant’s struggles, the court emphasized the severity of his actions and the need for deterrence against future violent protests.
Probert’s defense counsel expressed remorse on his behalf, highlighting his history of mental health challenges and recent struggles leading up to the protest. In a letter to the court, Probert issued an apology for his involvement in the demonstration and vowed not to engage in such behavior again. However, Judge Benedict Kelleher emphasized the importance of holding individuals accountable for violent actions, particularly in the context of protests that endanger public safety.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the sentencing of David Probert serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of engaging in violent behavior during protests. While individuals have the right to express their views, resorting to aggression and attacks on law enforcement cannot be tolerated. The court’s decision to impose a 14-month jail term on Probert underscores the seriousness of his actions and the need to uphold law and order in public demonstrations. As society grapples with political tensions and social unrest, it is crucial for individuals to exercise their rights peacefully and responsibly, without inciting violence or harm to others.